ml
New Member
Posts: 4 
|
Post by ml on Apr 18, 2015 11:23:03 GMT
Appreciate if you could add me to the email list as well.
mlouhen@gmail.com
Seems Saxo Switzerland wants to play it the hard way, so be it then.
Very interested to hear what steps others have taken; and whether we have been receiving the same type of legal advise...
|
|
ez
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by ez on Apr 20, 2015 9:28:12 GMT
what did they send you? I should be also interested to share info and coordinate actions if needed.
|
|
ml
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by ml on Apr 23, 2015 5:43:45 GMT
Hi ez, I send you a private message on the forum.
Happy to share experiences in private messages with anyone else too.
You can also e-mail me at mlouhen@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
Post by Unfortunate on Sept 15, 2015 21:24:55 GMT
Any new development in this group? Very quite from my side, just one letter from Eversheds and then nothing since many monthes ...
|
|
|
|
Post by swissie on Oct 27, 2015 5:57:19 GMT
Any news on the saxo case from anybody? Has anybody raised a complaint with the swiss ombudsmann? Their foreign peers have all ruled in the clients favor (which was to be expected considering the ruthless busineas pracrices by saxo). So this could be a promising route.
|
|
|
|
Post by Constanze on Oct 27, 2015 23:03:21 GMT
Hallo swissi
You wrote, that " the foreign peers of the swiss ombudsman have all rules in the clients favor "
I only know the decision of the british ombudsman in the CMC case, were CMC should pay the price around 1,19 to the clients
And IG also renewed the price
Do you know of other peers of the ombudsman in other countries, that decided for the clients favor?
Best Regards
|
|
|
|
Post by bucksaxa on Apr 3, 2016 13:54:54 GMT
Dear All,
I recently received my "Debt Settlement Programme Final Request for Payment" letter from EVERSHEDS.
Can anyone help me out with the following questions:
1. Which lawyer/law firm are you using?
2. Can anyone inform me who is already in this process what the actual settlement results are?
Many thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
Post by A Friend on Jun 3, 2016 11:26:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Noname on Jun 28, 2016 12:12:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Franck on Jun 28, 2016 17:57:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by goodvsevil on Aug 21, 2017 18:23:23 GMT
Dear All, I recently received my "Debt Settlement Programme Final Request for Payment" letter from EVERSHEDS. Can anyone help me out with the following questions: 1. Which lawyer/law firm are you using? 2. Can anyone inform me who is already in this process what the actual settlement results are? Many thanks in advance Hi all, any recent actions? what was the result of getting (i assume ignoring?) the letter from EVERSHEDS? I've just got one... not sure if actions required. any suggestions? thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
Post by Erik on Sept 19, 2017 17:03:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by TraderX on Sept 20, 2017 7:05:39 GMT
Their lawyer said all three will appeal. The ruling says: "Retten finder ikke at kunne tillægge de påberåbte afgørelser fra New Zealand, England og Schweiz vægt, idet disse sager er afgjort i forhold til selskaber, som ikke er parter i denne sag og er afgjort i henhold til fremmed ret, hvis indhold eller aftalegrundlag hverken er dokumenteret eller procederet i disse sager." (p. 44). In short they say that they do not take the rulings from New Zealand, UK and Switzerland into consideration when looking at the Danish cases because they are not parties in the Danish cases and that the rulings are based on foreign law. |
|
|
|
Post by TraderX on Sept 20, 2017 7:07:51 GMT
amwatch.dk/AMNews/People/article9879306.ece"There were customers on our platform trading in Swiss franc, and suddenly their security was gone. Plus a lot more. Suddenly the customers had no means of paying it back. That meant that we had to write off the entire loss that our customers had." Write off the entire loss?  ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ninja on Sept 20, 2017 14:52:39 GMT
The ruling says: "Retten finder ikke at kunne tillægge de påberåbte afgørelser fra New Zealand, England og Schweiz vægt, idet disse sager er afgjort i forhold til selskaber, som ikke er parter i denne sag og er afgjort i henhold til fremmed ret, hvis indhold eller aftalegrundlag hverken er dokumenteret eller procederet i disse sager." (p. 44). In short they say that they do not take the rulings from New Zealand, UK and Switzerland into consideration when looking at the Danish cases because they are not parties in the Danish cases and that the rulings are based on foreign law. In short, the Danish mafia and their kangaroo court continue to look after their own. You are looking at the same global market with prices at the same time and instance as those in the NZ, UK and Swiss findings. How can the availability of liquidity in those three jurisdictions be consistent with the Danish findings of a lack of liquidity and proper behaviour by Saxo? What does "foreign law" have to do with it at all? Any foreign party doing business in Denmark should be worried. |
|
?